[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
danny666@virgilio.it (Danny Ayers) writes:
>It will be possible to get the benefits of XML and RDF technologies -
>that the primary serialization of RDF is XML is a big hint.
This is possible now, but not necessarily pleasant for those of us who
don't value the RDF content.
See last week's thread at:
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200304/msg00536.html
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200304/msg00532.html
I can use Trang quite easily to support W3C XML Schema-consuming
applications without having to change document structures. RDF/XML
unfortunately reaches all the way into the markup structures, not just
the schemas.
For me, that's substantial extra work with no added benefit except to
the 5% of my smarter friends who use RDF - and I figure they can cope
with XML.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
