[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Jonathan Robie scripsit:
> The Data Model, which is in Last Call, is particularly important right
> now - we have tried to design it so that we support XML Schema, but also
> merely-well-formed XML and XML governed by DTDs. We have also tried to
> keep it relatively simple. If people have time to review only one
> document, this is the one.
I have reviewed it, and I'm copying this to the public comments list.
I would like to see the Infoset-only model nevertheless process xsi:type
attributes as a special case. This would make it possible for a process
to serialize information about element types, at least, directly into
an XML document.
In addition, an xdt:attributeTypes attribute would be a Good Thing:
this would have list-of-QName type, and would alternate an attribute name
with its type.
Adopting these very slight modifications of Infoset-only rules would
allow upstream processes to specify type information (which is AFAICT
the main contribution of the PSVI to the data model) without the overhead
of a full PSVI.
--
Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan
in any language. --Allen Brown jcowan@reutershealth.com
|
