[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> was heard to say:
| / John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> was heard to say:
| | In my previous posting, archived at
| | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003May/0169.html ,
| | I forgot to mention that xsi:nil should also be recognized directly
| | from the Infoset.
|
| Yes, thank you. That's been pointed out several times and was, in
| fact, supposed to be fixed before the LC draft, but somehow I missed
| it.
Sorry folks, the preceding paragraph says exactly the *opposite* of
what I meant. I think I misread the last word of John's last sentence
as "PSVI" not "Infoset". It must be because they have so many letters
in common :-/
I have been persuaded that the current data model text *incorrectly*
references the "xsi:nil" attribute information item. It should only
refer to the PSVI [nil] property.
A thousand apologies for the confusion. And a thousand more for the
screams of outrage I fear this correction will incite. :-/
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | Science is like sex: sometimes something
XML Standards Architect | useful comes out, but that is not the reason
Web Tech. and Standards | we are doing it.--Richard Feynman
Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE+4LMZOyltUcwYWjsRAiNPAJ428NuKPK7PCPi3gbYp06a/dOjo5QCggQUC
15UfJ58XPmUjNom2+dZWxXY=
=zu9S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
