[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Richard Tobin wrote:
> This ia not much of a deficiency, such constraints are rare and rarely
> useful. Though I did once get a bug report for XSV because it did not
> accept maxOccurs="4294967296".
Have to agree that it's not a big deficiency. An astronomical maxOccurs is
probably rare, and rough on validators. But it's hard to predict how people
are going to use these things. "64K RAM is all anyone will need" comes to
mind.
Mike
|