xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar

RE: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>,"Joe English" <jenglish@flightlab.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
From: Dave Pawson <dpawson@nildram.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:19:42 +0100
In-reply-to: <AOEKKCOOGNDOAHCLNEIFAENPDOAA.mike@wyeast.net>
References: <200306172155.h5HLth113469@dragon.flightlab.com>

At 03:29 18/06/2003 -0700, Mike Fitzgerald wrote:

>Don't know, but I'd be interested to know. Who out there is using
>minOccurs/maxOccurs in XML Schema beyond zero-one-many? Can you live without
>minOccurs/maxOccurs or do you gotta have it?

http://www.loc.gov/nls/z3986/v100/

DAISY talking book.
Ripping off html, we used about 8 mandatory and a few optional
meta elements.

Seems a valid use case to me.
Currently validating using XSLT.

regards DaveP

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
  - From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
  - From: "Mike Fitzgerald" <mike@wyeast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] ANN: Namespace Routing Language
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] modeling, validating and documenting an xml grammar
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread