[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Yes, and it is such an old argument at this point, we
can do it by the numbers. I thought it interesting that
one editor believed the best thing to do with the problems
of knowing if a resource or a representation is 'on the web'
is to remove that phrase altogether.
I doubt the mathIsLogic and the observerIsProofOfExistence
camps will get together this season or ever. Both the
world and the web keep on working though.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
There's some good reading over at www-tag on the many "social" issues
surrounding URIs. The context is RDF-specific, but seems appropriate to
XML URI usage as well.
Original message (TimBL):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0022.html
Contrasting reply (Pat Hayes):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0147.html
There's lots of potentially useful food for thought in there, though I'm
still fond of this formulation:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0301.html
www-tag seems to be coming back to (cranky) life lately, albeit on
familiar territory. If anyone thinks, for instance, that the W3C,
Apache, and IETF get along magically, try:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0057.html
|
