[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 12:21 17/07/2003 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Well, that part of our infrastructure is an abomination IMHO.
>Sorry my code will fail on
> file://c:/sgml/uriincl/uriIncl.xml
>because from the small semantic I can extract from RFC 2396, it's
>a file scheme with a c:/ authority, and to me C: is neither
>a server nor a registered component.
+1, even I could see that.
Is microsoft wrong!!!!
> The only definition I found of the file scheme is RFC 1738
> http://www.w3.org/Addressing/rfc1738.txt
>which obviously shows its age (and is obsoleted by 2396 except 2396
>does not define specific scheme). 1738 states
Perhaps TAG could take this one up... since the ietf appears
content to let it rot?
regards DaveP
|