[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 06:15:00AM -0700, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>Debating the pros and cons of XML namespaces is like arguing about whether
>the internal combustion engine is a good idea. The world has moved on.
In the analogy proposed, xml-dev corresponds to transport-tech-dev. Not,
mind, ic-dev. But a place where alternatives to the dominant paradigm are
interesting, not threatening (and not boring).
Granted, criticism without suggesting an alternative grows ... wearisome,
after a while.
>Hopefully XML-DEV will catch on to this in a few years.
I hope not.
Namespaces seem to have proven a bad solution to a problem (or set of
problems). I have yet to see a good solution proposed, but perhaps I've
missed it (is that a cue for Arjun Ray?).
Amy!
--
Amelia A. Lewis amyzing {at} talsever.com
"Ruby fruit jungle?"
"Yeah, women are thick and rich and full of hidden treasures and
besides that, they taste good."
-- Rita Mae Brown, "Rubyfruit Jungle"
|
