xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] namespaces (was RE: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation)

Re: [xml-dev] namespaces (was RE: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] namespaces (was RE: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation)
From: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:39:26 +0100
Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AF3@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1173AF3@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Debating the pros and cons of XML namespaces is like arguing about whether the internal combustion engine is a good idea. The world has moved on.

In your world maybe, and good luck to ya. In my world XML Namespaces 
are being discarded as a bad idea.

> Hopefully XML-DEV will catch on to this in a few years. 

As it did with WXS or SOAP-RPC, no doubt.

Bill de hÓra

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] namespaces (was RE: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation)
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] namespaces (was RE: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] namespaces (was RE: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread