[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: Bill de hÓra <bill@dehora.net>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] namespaces (was RE: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation)
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:43:27 -0700
- Cc: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Thread-index: AcNQqoC6vxkaUsNPQ86XPaZVrKAmlAACFYUA
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] namespaces (was RE: [xml-dev] rss regularis(z)ation)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill de hÓra [mailto:bill@dehora.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:39 PM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: Simon St.Laurent; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] namespaces (was RE: [xml-dev] rss
> regularis(z)ation)
>
> > Debating the pros and cons of XML namespaces is like
> arguing about whether the internal combustion engine is a
> good idea. The world has moved on.
>
> In your world maybe, and good luck to ya. In my world XML
> Namespaces are being discarded as a bad idea.
Obviously we live in different worlds. Mine is described here
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnxml/html/understxml.asp
What does yours look like?
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Any given program, when running, is obsolete.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
|
