[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
If you recommended that, you are obligated to:
1. Answer all bug reports from any and all users
of documents with the http-empowered names
for which no representations are retrieved (by intent)
2. Write the section of the Government recommendations
that explains why it is a good idea to use http-empowered
names in cases where no representation will ever be
retrieved by dereferencing because the intent of the
author wasn't clearly expressed (by omission).
3. Answering all future questions and resolving all future
permathreads on the futility of using http-empowered
names in cases where the author can't make up their
mind about what they intend (by confusion).
4. Donate your current and all future income to paying
off the increased costs of using http-empowered names
for any of the above because someone a few years ago
said it was a sin to use a non-http-dereferencable
name on the world wide web. If you can find them
at the W3C, you might inveigle them to share your pain.
Or just do as RDF does and make a hash of it.
;-)
len
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
As a sidenote, I recommended that this document be updated to also
include URL formats for namespace identifiers. Oh, which reminds me: I
need to check on its status...
|
