[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
james.anderson@setf.de (james anderson) writes:
>> While that is compelling, it's probably not acceptable given that
>> you may have multiple consumers of your data who may or may not be
>> machines.
>
>but how many of those non-machines will not have their access mediated
>by one?
Depends on what you mean by "mediated". While I do occasionally work
with XML on paper or blackboards, I generally work with it in text
editors. I occasionally (10% ?) edit XML indirectly through an
application, which is a heavier form of mediation. I don't think I ever
work with XML expecting _never_ to have to look at the markup.
In any case, I design my own tools around the expectation that mediation
may be available but will not be necessary for interpretation.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
