Lists Home |
Date Index |
> From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: 09 September 2003 16:30
> I remember that errata, it causes a few problems for XQuery and
> IMHO shouldn't have been accepted. A simple type being the
> derived type of a complex type is just weird.
And the problem with "weird" is that you can guarantee that there will be as
many different interpretations as there are schema tools. Whilst looking for
a theoretical solution is what makes xml-dev great to read, in the real
world I would always use mixed content here. In the right environment, I
might add some Schematron to enforce the extra rules.
Boynings Consulting Ltd