xml-dev - Re: the yin/yang web, was: Re: [xml-dev] xml schema and OWL

Re: the yin/yang web, was: Re: [xml-dev] xml schema and OWL

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Subject: Re: the yin/yang web, was: Re: [xml-dev] xml schema and OWL
From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:49:47 -0400
Cc: leb27@drexel.edu,xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <3F7A0C1F.60908@openhealth.org>
References: <1272f711275e99.1275e991272f71@drexel.edu><6.0.0.22.2.20030930154224.01dc9c10@ncmail.datadirect.com><3F7A0C1F.60908@openhealth.org>

At 07:05 PM 9/30/2003, Jonathan Borden wrote:
>Jonathan Robie wrote:
>
>>... XML Schema and OWL are not two parts of some integrated system, they 
>>live in largely separate universes.
>
>This article is a nice discussion of the issues: 
>http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/231/

I agree. In fact, so far, this is the best thing I have read on the 
relationship between the XML Web and the Semantic Web.

Jonathan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: the yin/yang web, was: Re: [xml-dev] xml schema and OWL
  - From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Managing Innovation
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Looking for Schema for Requirements and Specifications Manual(s)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] More on ontolgies and/or PageRank (tm)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: the yin/yang web, was: Re: [xml-dev] xml schema and OWL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread