[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bob Foster scripsit:
> But relationships do change all the time. <#Simon> :sonOf_:1 is as good an
> example as any. I assume the 1 is intended to be the cardinality, so the
> relationship might be better named sonOfFather.
No, no. <#Simon> :sonOf _:1 (note that you dropped a space) uses _:1 as
a label for an anonymous node, the equivalent of an existentially quantified
variable. In plain English, it says "Simon is the son of someone."
--
"[T]he Unicode Standard does not encode John Cowan
idiosyncratic, personal, novel, or private http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
use characters, nor does it encode logos http://www.reutershealth.com
or graphics." jcowan@reutershealth.com
|
