[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Tyler Close wrote,
> I am only saying that it must be feasible to maintain an ASN.1
> implementation as part of a legacy codebase.
This is only interesting if expressed in relative terms: it must be at
least as feasible to maintain an ASN.1 implementation as it would be to
maintain comparable alternatives. I can't think of any particularly
good reasons for thinking that's not the case.
> Obviously, OpenSSL and SNMP have had difficulties with that. Are there
> counter-examples of applications that have not had long-lived bugs
> in their ASN.1 code?
Would you like some examples of undetected crimes as well? ;-)
Cheers,
Miles
|
