[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Joe Gregorio wrote:
> I went back and looked at RDDL for inspiration and began to
> prototype an RDDL file that would delineate some of
> those resources, for example a 'favicon.ico' and 'robots.txt'.
> Here is what I came up with so far:
RDDL has been getting simpler, the latest highly unofficial draft is at
http://www.tbray.org/tag/rddl4.html - it's just XHTML with rddl:nature
and rddl:purpose attributes on good ol' <a href=
> <rddl:resource xlink:type="simple"
> xlink:title="RSS Feed - Full Content"
> xlink:role="http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/application/rss+xml";
>
> xlink:arcrole="http://www.rddl.org/purposes#syndication";
> xlink:href="http://bitworking.org/index.rss";
> >
<a href="http://bitworking.org/index.rss";
rddl:nature="http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/application/rss+xml";
rddl:purpose="http://www.rddl.org/purposes#syndication";>RSS Feed - full
content</a>
I'm sure you can work out the rest.
> 2. Note that the list of RSS feeds could be quite large
> as the initial impetus for this was Jeremy Zawodny
> trying to find a way to list all the feeds that Yahoo!
> produces. Now instead of just a flat listing
> this number of feeds would probably
> best be grouped into categories. Am I missing something
> or does RDDL not allow a grouping of resources?
There's nothing built in. Dave Winer et al are proposing OPML for this
purpose because it's hierarchical. So instead of a ton of pointers in
the RDDL, you'd have one, to the OPML doc.
> 3. Going back to Tim's initial proposal, are there
> any thoughts on what that
> "small (but extensible) RDF vocabulary" would look like?
I'm beginning to think RDDL is just the ticket for this. -Tim
|
