[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> I'm still not convinced. These two documents are the same:
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <root><</root>
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8+names"?>
> <root><</root>
No, in UTF-8+names, < isn't a predefined replacement - remember, it
knows about the ones from HTML & MathML, but not the XML magic five; so
these two docs are entirely different. The second one would be accepted
by an XML processor.
> Or am I missing something?
I think so. Which probably means the documentation has to be clearer
about this.
--
Cheers, Tim Bray (http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/)
|