xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Alternative "character entity" proposal

Re: [xml-dev] Alternative "character entity" proposal

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Alternative "character entity" proposal
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 18:00:59 -0400
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <r02000200-1028-248BFA7404D611D888600003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
References: <20031022211207.GB24300@w3.org> <r02000200-1028-248BFA7404D611D888600003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Simon St.Laurent scripsit:

> (XML Core is not one of the parts of the W3C renowned for its openness,
> I'm afraid.)

Very true, and nobody hates that more than I do.

-- 
Using RELAX NG compact syntax to        John Cowan
develop schemas is one of the simple    http://www.reutershealth.com
pleasures in life....                   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Jeni Tennison                 <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Alternative "character entity" proposal
  - From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] Alternative "character entity" proposal
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Alternative "character entity" proposal
Next by Date: Re: Backslash n [OT] was Line Separator and Paragraph Separator
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Alternative "character entity" proposal
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Alternative "character entity" proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread