RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft Hypes Up XUL As The Greatest Expiriment S ince Adam And Eve

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

True.  But given the tools, it is still great fun.

len


From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]

clbullar@ingr.com (Bullard, Claude L (Len)) writes:
>It is the performance of the mush of different XML 
>languages and objects that would make me wince.  One 
>has to ask, why do this in XML at all.

XML is good at providing a facade of openness to things which really
aren't open.