xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
From: "Dave Butler" <butlerdi@manxsoft.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:39:38 -0800
References: <003c01c3ae14$2922c7b0$650aa8c0@BOBDEV> <3FBB1F9F.40109@allette.com.au>
Reply-to: "Dave Butler" <butlerdi@fsmail.net>

Somebody was asking about tests between ASN1 and XML.

I work in an industry where resticted bandwith, memory and butget push us towards binary. When dealing with mobile solutions particularly satallite based D+ or Fleet costs really add up when sending large XML files. Tx rates are slow and if the byte charges dont get cha the connect time will.

Here is a study by some guys a while ago;

http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/en/biblio/cokus-xml-sizing.pdf

dave

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>

References:
- Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and a text editor, barefoot in the winter,uphill both ways [...]
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread