[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bob Foster scripsit:
> As was pointed out earlier, the "schema-centric" view is missing the
> ability to say, for elements, that no order is prescribed and order is
> not significant. Same semantics as attributes.
If order is not significant, why not prescribe an order? It simplifies
implementation to do so.
> Further, the schema-centric viewpoint you describe is definitely not the
> common usage for iterated choices, e.g., (a|b|...)*. In this case, no
> order (or cardinality) are prescribed and the semantics is usually that
> order is not significant.
XHTML is a massive counterexample: order is extremely significant, but
most content models are of exactly that form.
--
There is / One art John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
No more / No less http://www.reutershealth.com
To do / All things http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
With art- / Lessness -- Piet Hein
|
