[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Betty Harvey <harvey@eccnet.com> writes:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your endorsement, but XSV is not the gold standard -- as
>> the status page [1] makes clear, there are implementation gaps and
>> known bugs, to say nothing of unknown bugs.
>>
>
> Please forgive me if this sounds like a 'rant'. Are there any 'gold
> standard schema parsers?
I think the situation is better than you suggest. Without being
specific in a way which would be inappropriate given my W3C position,
I would say that my experience over the last six months is a
significant decrease in interop problems among the three or four best
schema processors. Unfortunately one of the ones _not_ in that
category is also one of the most widely used/distributed, which skews
people's perceptions.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
