[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Betty Harvey" <harvey@eccnet.com>,"Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Question
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:42:41 -0800
- Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Thread-index: AcOzg26jeLJi9bzCQZycKd6WWXujagAAHmfy
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Question
It depends do you mean that it validates according to the rules at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/ or the rules at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/ + http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata ?
________________________________
From: Betty Harvey [mailto:harvey@eccnet.com]
Sent: Tue 11/25/2003 11:26 AM
To: Elliotte Rusty Harold
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Gold Standard Schema Parser was Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Question
My initial question is still unanswered - which W3C schema can I trust to
validate a schema (I will take 95%)? Right now I don't have confidence in
any of the schema parsers. I want a parser that provides me the same
amount of confidence that I have in James Clark NSGMLS.
Betty
|
