xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Micros

RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Micros

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@ingr.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:04:53 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9EFAD@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
Reply-to: <bob@wyman.us>

Claude L Bullard wrote:
> If XAML only runs on the MS desktop, and is not 
> an on-the-wire format, ok.
	Microsoft's Longhorn help files say that BAML is "optimized
for download". That sure sounds like "on-the-wire"...

		bob wyman

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Is there a use for standardized binary XML (was RE: Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread