[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
- From: <Ari.Nordstrom@sorman.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 09:07:12 +0100
- Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Thread-index: AcO7Bsj0pDLXkRQkTMO6EsM1X5lAYg==
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] RE: RNG more popular with doc heads and XSD with data heads?
John Cowan wrote...
> Ari.Nordstrom@sorman.com scripsit:
>
> > I'm a dochead, and the answer's simple for me. XSD is way
> too complex
> > to write, and it has some annoying shortcomings. I'd go
> with DTDs (and
> > so far, my clients do, too) but if we absolutely must have something
> > else, then Relax NG seems far more accessible.
>
> DTDs are just a third syntax for RELAX NG. :-)
Ah, that explains it. :-)
Docheads, unite!
/Ari
|
