OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   RE: [xml-dev] The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

But it was Allen Ginsburg who sat on the floor 
next to me, grabbed my left hand, and insisted 
that I play the normative blues hammer on pull 
off riff as he improvised his poetry rather than 
let me improvise in my own style along with him. 
He had his style issues and he 
stuck to his guns on them.  He said I was playing 
too many notes and wandering off The Beat, and 
after all, The Beat mattered.  He had a good point.

Real time usually wants simplicity and familiarity.  
In a recording studio where we could have compared 
takes, he might have liked it better, but I would 
have also converged on The Beat.  Feedback is the 
beginning of intelligence and perhaps all that discriminates 
creativity from repetition.

I wish there were more random audiences.  These days 
it seems to me they've become overspecialized, overfed, 
and are clinging to The Eagles and Lynard Skynard for 
dear life.  Glad to see The OutKasts.

XML succeeds because it is just enough rules and otherwise 
doesn't give a d**m.  Should we write our presentations 
in XML?  Well, how adaptive is the display engine to 
real time control?  How well can one write the content 
to be adaptible?   Tool AND talent AND practice.

len

From: roger.day@globalgraphics.com [mailto:roger.day@globalgraphics.com]

content matches form meets audience distribution, at least that would be
content's dream. Mozart had some complexity to say, but he left it up to
the specialists to batter their heads against the semantic conduits. Music
can carry complex abstractions better, I think, because it's received by a
different part of the brain; sounds and words aim at other parts where
complexities are less welcome in the arena of performance. I've attended
John Ashberry and Allen Ginsberg readings; the heart and mind were engaged
at different areas in both.

But, as a rule of thumb, with a randomly selected audience, I'd go for
simple. Of course, if I could guarantee an audience of PhD students, then
the blackboard would be full of indecipherable and chalkdust take the
hindmost.




 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS