xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] repercussions

Re: [xml-dev] repercussions

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] repercussions
From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@yahoo.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 23:07:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E529380D1@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E529380D1@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Joshua Allen wrote:
> Right.  I don't think many people rely on qnames in content, or when
> they do only for very limited scenarios.

If "content" includes "attribute values", there is a prominent
counter example: XSLT, which happens to rely on XPath.

J.Pietschmann

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] repercussions
  - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] repercussions
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] repercussions
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] repercussions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread