[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> rob@koberg.com (Robert Koberg) writes:
>
>>The post (which I looked for at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>>that only shows post up to 2003-12 -- thanks Simon) that cocked my
>>trigger was:
>>
>>http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200401/msg00115.html
>>
>>just a little too hard to stomach.
>
>
> Funny. That's the post where I concluded that a gratuitous argument
> about a particular site had turned into a conversation worth following.
>
> It's tough when Elliotte's that completely right, but it happens pretty
> regularly. Usually when I'm on the other side, unfortunately.
>
Aww geez... I am feeling like an ass (though I don't think my complaint
was wrong).
I usually agree with him because when I tried to learn something about
XML I searched and found something by elharo that answered my question.
I even contacted him to review my code, but did not want to agree to his
changes to our NDA...
It was simply the fact that he perscribed a certain *way* which turned
out to be untested (and still really is).
aaarrggghhh,
-Rob
|
