Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions

From
Elliotte Rusty Harold <>
To
"Simon St.Laurent" <>
Date
2004-01-14T04:39:50Z
ID
<p06010205bc2a7825b4be@[192.168.254.4]>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
One thing I noticed in several of the articles I read on this issue 
from authors on both sides of the fence was a disturbing tendency to 
confuse well-formedness with validity. I am firm in my belief that 
well-formedness is a minimum criterion we should not compromise on. 
Validity is much more negotiable.

Some times it was obvious from context what the author really meant. 
Sometimes it wasn't.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA