[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bob Wyman wrote:
> In other mail, it has been pointed out that the ISO
>language codes include "mul" (multiple) and "und"
>(undetermined). Thus, what I was suggesting in my earlier
>note (new tags i-unknown and i-mixed) is unnecessary.
>
I believe that W3C I18n WG is also clarifying undeclaration of language
using xml:lang="", which is a much more elegant default than "und".
(It falls outside the RFC 3066 scope, being the meaning of the absense of
a code rather than a code.)
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
|