Re: [xml-dev] Genx

[Marc-Antoine Parent <maparent@acm.org>]

> If someone wants to put a generic UTF-16 processor on top of genx, 
> that would be fine.  I don't see the demand for supporting it at the 
> input end of genx because the UTF-16 centric languages like Java and 
> C# have decent xml-writing software already. -Tim

Makes sense. One note, however; a C program might receive a UCS-16 
string from elsewhere, eg a file or database, and want to pass it on 
without processing.
Still, the conversion from UCS-16 to either UTF-8 or UCS-32 is 
trivial...
Marc-Antoine Parent

smime.p7s