xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items

Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 13:41:29 -0800
Cc: "xml-dev mailing list" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <007901c3e0f7$7d81fa40$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
References: <0806139A-4C8A-11D8-905C-000A95A51C9E@textuality.com> <007901c3e0f7$7d81fa40$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>

On Jan 22, 2004, at 6:53 AM, Karl Waclawek wrote:

> - the genxEndStartTag() call is not really necessary,
>   as it can be inferred from internal writer state

I'm inclined to agree.  A teeny bit more complexity in the 
implementation but probably worth it.  Anyone want to push back? -Tim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items
  - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>

References:
- genx - consensus items
  - From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items
  - From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] genx - genxEndTag
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] genx - genxEndTag
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] genx - genxEndTag
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS