xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] genx

Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>,"Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items
From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@waclawek.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 19:51:56 -0500
Cc: "xml-dev mailing list" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0401221921530.9182-100000@smtp.datapower.com>


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>


> > I'm inclined to agree.  A teeny bit more complexity in the
> > implementation but probably worth it.  Anyone want to push back? -Tim
> 
> asymnmetry is bad.  open-close, begin-end, etc.

There is no real assymmetry.
Just rename genxStartStartTag to genxStartTag and you have symmetry again.


Karl

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items
  - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items
Next by Date: JAXB Reference Implementation Bug ?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] genx - consensus items
Next by thread: genx: canonicalization vs. pretty printing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread