xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?

Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:34:52 -0800
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org,David Tolpin <dvd@davidashen.net>
In-reply-to: <40157957.90606@datapower.com>
References: <200401262015.i0QKFRMe040000@adat.davidashen.net> <40157957.90606@datapower.com>

On Jan 26, 2004, at 12:32 PM, Rich Salz wrote:

>> The world needs     - the commented form of Canonical XML
>
> And the ability to add exc-c14n without too much difficulty, please.

Having read the exc-c14n draft, I couldn't figure out how this would 
affect the behavior of genx. -Tim

smime.p7s

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?
  - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?
  - From: David Tolpin <dvd@davidashen.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?
  - From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: Genx c14n?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread