[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Thanks Joe. That is most useful.
The problem is technology push vs customer pull
given weak or churning frameworks and extremes
in the customer requirements across three tiers
of system cost and complexity. What is the
80/20 of these specifications this year? What
will they be next year, and so on? If the
IJIS wants to do this, then the consultants
(say RCC, Gartner, etc.) have to work this
out in the RFP language. Too much, and it
is CALS: too expensive and industry resists
it. Too little and the change is trivial
and not worth the time so we have to keep
selling customization instead of agency
interoperability. This has to be
figured well and matched to the real capabilities
of the frameworks and the resources of the
procurements. Federal dollars are one
approach, but they come with high risks
with regards to completion and sustainment,
so they are an unreliable means to push.
len
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> And the proper folks would be?
DOJ IWG Membership: http://www.ijis.org/membership/index.html
|
