[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
I heard these recently:
Patenting in US is much more affordable, whereas patenting in countries
like Japan are much more expensive. The current ineffeciencies in
recognizing not-worthy patents ensures that the patenting process is
cheap. There are pros and cons to cheaper patenting process: pros include
even individuals who come up with original ideas can patent; cons are
known to everyone..
Of course, there is question of enforcing the patent (or) patent
law-suits, which will be very expensive, and which will go through
experts. For example, several patents issued by USPTO I am sure when it
goes to enforcing the patent, they will be considered as prior-art; so any
law suit might not hold.
But still it is a scary thought of potential patent infringement.
best, murali.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Michael Champion wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2004, at 7:27 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
>
> >
> > What I would like to know is, is it a conspiracy (protectionism for the
> > US software industry, jobs for the lawyers), or is it just
> > incompetence?
> >
>
> I submit that this is the ur-question at the heart of almost
> everything. I remember first encountering it in THE PETER PRINCIPLE in
> high school years. "Is the world run by intelligent people who are
> putting us on, or by fools who don't know any better."
>
> The betting seems to be on fools; There are lots of famous quotes to
> the effect "never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained
> by incompetence." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor
> (Of course it should be "Heinlein's Razor ... I wonder if the
> corruption is due to malice or incompetence, sigh, or maybe somebody's
> self-referential sense of humor).
>
> Back to the USPTO ... the best explanation I've heard for all this is
> that the USPTO culture assumes that any previously patentable idea is
> in their database. Since software was not patentable for a long time,
> many good software ideas were never submitted to the USPTO, hence were
> never put in their database. Thus, they are simply blind to the
> innovations of the first 30 years or so of computer science and
> engineering. I have no idea of the source or the validity of that
> hypothesis.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
|
