[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] semantics in schema (xsd)
- From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
- Date: 03 Mar 2004 14:32:50 -0800
- In-reply-to: <403F82AA.2030301@attglobal.net>
- References: <002201c3fd4f$5916b550$0201a8c0@IRENE><403F82AA.2030301@attglobal.net>
- Sender: ari@fdra.lib.aero
- User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
David Megginson <dmeggin@attglobal.net> writes:
> I'd say forget about classes and make your objects big bags of properties (attributes and relationships).
> There exists an entity A.
> A is human.
> A is male.
> A is married to B.
> A is a biological parent of C.
Ahh... Imagine what that would do to the Prolog-101 canMarry(A,B)
--
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.
|
