xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications

RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Chiusano Joseph'" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 19:36:02 +0100
In-reply-to: <406D92C2.2ABE8DB2@bah.com>
Thread-index: AcQY0ApmjrA8CfmzR56y6zXP2SUWQQAEOPHA

> 
> I have a theory on the subject of "competing specifications" that I'd
> like to present, in hopes of getting some good feedback.

I think you're ignoring the bandwagon effect. Very often, if there are two
competing specifications, people sit on the fence and don't adopt either of
them, because they don't know which one is going to win. For example the
OpenLook/Motif war, if you remember that one. XML was adopted so rapidly
largely because it had no competition.

Michael Kay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
  - From: David Megginson <dmeggin@attglobal.net>

References:
- Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
  - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>

Prev by Date: Error?! When parsing XML with DOMParser in Applet
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
Previous by thread: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread