[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Thank Michael. I read that and appreciated it when
it was published.
From the X3D perspective, we had the requirements
for a binary for real-time 3D before we created
the new XML-encoding. VRML97 uses a format that
for text, is about as parsimonious as it gets.
It wasn't enough. So XML binarization is not
our motivator; XML just made the requirement more
necessary given its verbosity and problems with
data type support, but we need the binary with
or with out XML, and so, that is a task going
forward with some priority at the W3DC.
len
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Leventhal [mailto:hanagid@earthlink.net]
I might mention again that I wrote an article last year covering the
first W3C binary XML workshop activity which cataloged, for your
pleasure Len, the various features and objectives of the many different
attempts. See
http://www.sys-con.com/xml/article.cfm?id=745
|
