[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 18:25, Tim Bray wrote:
>
> Right, but I thought the whole X.694 idea was that because you knew the
> schema you could encode character data that was representing numbers
> super-efficiently and represent the tags as small integers; thus the
> saving. So does X.finf actually give you that much of a saving? -Tim
Yes, but of course not us much as using a schema-based approach. Our
preliminary numbers show a performance improvement similar to other
related technologies such as Dennis S. XBIS --BTW, even though type
information for numeric data cannot be used, qnames and repeated content
can still be encoded as small ints without altering the infoset.
-- Santiago
This is a digitally signed message part
|
