[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: xml-dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hardfor Aunt Trudie?
- From: "Kirkham, Pete (UK)" <pete.kirkham@baesystems.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:46:22 +0100
- Thread-index: AcQnHsPzMPW0WacRQKiY9BUs+2CMDgAh4dPA
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hardfor Aunt Trudie?
Overloaded symbols are a pain- I still quite often see x^y get used as (common-lisp:expt x y) in languages where it means (common-lisp:logxor x y) and visa-versa. On the other hand, if the operands type and the context of the operation make the meaning unambiguous, they can be useful.
Pete
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************
|