OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] XML: logical and/or physical model?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Michael Champion wrote:

> As I understand it, it is the job of the RDBMS implementation to  
> perform whatever mapping from the logical to physical world is needed  
> to do this efficiently. [1]  Perhaps one  advantage of XML is that it  
> just blows off this distinction -- it gets a lot of its practical power  
> by 'modeling' relationships as *physical* containment of a set of  
> elements (which of course may be subtrees) inside other elements.

I'd suggest a slightly different focus: the physical model is private while 
the logical model is public.  XML is designed to handle the public, logical 
part so that people can share information without being forced to use the 
same physical models.

Date's speech rants not against XML itself but against XML encroaching on 
the physical side.  Granted, he doesn't like SQL much either, but he might 
be right about XML, unless object-oriented and XML databases are performing 
and scaling a lot better than they were the last time I looked.

I agree with the advantages Michael lists for XML outside the database.

All the best,



News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS