[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing)
- From: "Kirkham, Pete (UK)" <pete.kirkham@baesystems.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 09:58:11 +0100
- Thread-index: AcRNyDjyu+2rs9mVR72qDYu4cKhDrwANc1Qg
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing)
> From: Michael Champion [mailto:mc@xegesis.org]
> Sent: 09 June 2004 03:19
> To: XML Developers List
In the current context, I'd say that the above is metadata, and below is content.
> So "metadata" is "content" transformed into a more conveniently
> machine-processable form?
A lot of useful metadata about documents is data about the processes and pathways that derived the content, rather than a transformation of the content.
Blog apps seem to do this reasonably well when the content is generated or edited; so do mail clients.
Most other end user apps don't, and you use CVS/CMS systems/BibTeX+CiteSeer to add it. CiteSeer is a trust based community, and allows metadata based searches.
But how this is meant to scale to agents and OWL-WS I haven't a clue.
Pete
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************
|
