[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote in message
f5b3c4nbzul.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk">news:f5b3c4nbzul.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk...
> "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> writes:
>
> > I believe you found the cause in your explanation below - the
> > restriction is not actually a restriction. You would have to - for
> > example - change one of the maxOccurs facets from "unbounded" to "5" (or
> > anything other than "unbounded").
>
> Sorry, that's not a problem -- vacuous restriction is allowed. I
> don't know the details of the validator involved, but I would guess
> that the problem is that you're using anonymous type definitions --
> W3C XML Schema requires the type definition of an element in a restriction
to be
> the same as or derived from the type definition of the corresponding
> element, and it only _guarantees_ identity for type definitions with
> names. So move that anonymous definition up to the top level, give it
> a name, and refer to it _by_ name, i.e.
>
> <xsd:element name="FirstElement" type="myChoiceType"/>
>
> in both base and restriction, and you should win.
>
> ht
> --
> Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of
Edinburgh
> Half-time member of W3C Team
> 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
> Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
> URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged
spam]
>
I tried you're solution not 5 minutes before reading your reply and it
resolved the problem. So, it does appear the anoymous type were the cause.
Thank you both for your replies,
Brent Worden
|
