[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bryan Rasmussen <bry@itnisk.com> writes:
> If I do the following restriction
>
> <complexType name="InvoiceType">
> <complexContent>
> <restriction base="pie:laxInvoiceType">
> <sequence>
> <element ref="com:ID"/>
> <element ref="com:IssueDate"/>
> <element ref="pie:TypeCode" maxOccurs="1"/>
> <element ref="com:SellerParty"/>
> . . .
> </restriction>
> </complexContent>
> </complexType>
>
> <complexType name="laxInvoiceType">
> <sequence>
> <any namespace="http://thecomnamespace"; processContents="lax"
> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> <element ref="pie:TypeCode" maxOccurs="1"/>
> <element ref="main:InvoiceCurrencyCode" minOccurs="0"/>
> <any namespace="http://thecomnamespace"; processContents="lax"
> minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> </sequence>
> </complexType>
>
> will that mean that all the elements in the com namespace under my
> pie:Invoice will be processed Lax?
No. There's no such thing as lax processing of items being validated
by a declared element, unless/until an error occurs or an explicit
wildcard is involved.
> Any good xsd lists to send this too anyway?
xmlschema-dev@w3.org (subscribe via xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org,
archives at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/)
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
