Lists Home |
Date Index |
Hunsberger, Peter wrote:
> Not to say it's a bad archive format, just to say that I don't
> see why it stands the test of long term usability necessarily better
> than any other format. XML parsers may be just a curious artifact of
> the past in 20 years...
But I don't need a parser to read element and attribute names, and see
how things nest.
For archival purposes, of course, the simpler the markup, the better.