OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] Why *is* XQuery taking so long?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

It's still worth it if the learning curve is retained.

A small team can put a small craft into 
sub-orbital flight at lower costs.  But 
the composites and display systems came of 
having a big team do it first at very high costs.  

That's progress.  "It don't come easy" or cheap 
the first time, and if the progress isn't replicable, 
the second time either.  It will be interesting 
to see what the W3C does to learn, remember, and 
reapply.   We're in that same mode at the W3DC.


From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect.com]

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> But understand the audience and don't play Bach if they came 
> to boogie. Could XQuery have come out in successive versions 
> with simpler accompaniment? 

We now know that we could have done most of the type work later, 
releasing a dynamically typed language and adding the static typing in a 
subsequent release. The awful fact is, we couldn't know that for sure 
until after the static typing was done.

And I think we could have been done 1 to 2 years earlier if we had 
learned the lessons we now know about process on a complex spec with 
lots of players and lots of industry interest. The awful fact is, we had 
to flounder a while to figure some of this out.



News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS