OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] Conformance testing and the XML-test-suite

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

>> As far as I can tell, the XML spec does not state that a non-validating
>> XML processor must not report VC violations. However, the moment it does 
>> report some of them, it could be considered a faulty validating pocessor.
> But the parser clearly identifies itself as non-validating.
>> From a practical point of view, a non-validating processor that
>> reports VC violations as errors would not be very useful, as you could
>> not check for well-formedness of a document, unless you examine each
>> reported error manually.
> Sure you could-- the parser would report WF errors as Fatal Errors and 
> stop processing, while it would report VC errors as Errors and continue 
> processing.

Yes, that is, if the parser  makes such a distinction.



News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS