OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com> writes:
> I agree with that.  It does have a graph model which is 
> what I thought the question was.

Nah, that would be too easy... :-)
> Overloading schemas?  It raises the archforms question again, 
> but the declarative techniques were simple.
> We're noodling at solutions for which I'm not yet convinced 
> there is a market, but this is XML-Dev and we are supposed 
> to do that. 
Ahh, good, I thought perhaps I was just suffering from the effects of
too much caffeine and not enough breakfast just before rushing off to
lunch:  I'll take standardized universal knowledge interchange and a
tuna salad on wheat berry please....

> len
> From: Hunsberger, Peter [mailto:Peter.Hunsberger@STJUDE.ORG]
> Well RDF seems to be the answer that keeps popping up in this 
> thread and as I've said, I do think it's part of the answer.  
> I'm just not sure it's the complete answer.  You've still got 
> the problem of addressability which then drags in ontologies 
> or link bases.  As soon as you drag in either of those you've 
> got the problem of query mechanisms and given the current 
> state of the art and the amount of machinery you need to 
> manage and move around to handle all that I'm not sure you 
> have anything approaching a universal solution?


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS